First Anniversary Reflection

For more than 16 years, local hero of mine, Irene Tinker, hosted monthly gatherings into their home centered around international development called the devSalon. The atmosphere of these gatherings was always lively and the conversations important and relevant. Five years ago when Irene announced that she was no longer hosting the devSalons, I created Development Drinks to keep the community alive.

Watching this sector and community grow and connect over the past five years has been a true pleasure. From people getting new jobs and connecting to volunteer opportunities, to learning novel approaches to development and connecting socially, I’m proud of its success. However, after watching so many coincidental meetings we saw a ton of benefits in creating a space for this community to flourish.

A year ago, Anne Castleton, formerly of Mercy Corps, and I gathered around 50 Oregon-based international development organizations together to hear from them how they could benefit from more collaboration, networking, mentorship, and direct support. Over the past year we’ve had numerous conversations with organizations, university programs, peer-network groups in other states, and countless others.

Due to the generous donation of the Vatheuer Family Foundation, we were able to launch GlobalPDX last month at the Elevating Impact Summit. It has been wonderful to connect with the innovators in our community, from remote sensors on water pumps to integrated reforestation and health projects in the jungles of Borneo, Oregonians are doing some incredible work around the world. I’m ecstatic about the response to GlobalPDX, now boasting over 70 members with more joining every week.

I’m looking forward to continue to share the stories of members and to help the community professionalize, grow, and increase their impact around the world. Thank you to the organizations who have joined and for everyone else to make this a reality. I’m proud of our progress up to this point and I can’t wait to see how we grow over the coming years!

Aaron Liss is the Technical Director of Green Empowerment and has been running Development Drinks since 2012.

International Development Roundtable kick-off meeting March 2016

 

GlobalPDX kick-off at the Elevating Impact Summit, February 2017. Marissa Stryle, Andrea Johnson, and Aaron Liss (left to right).

Impact Invention Award given to two GlobalPDX members

Congratulations to GlobalPDX members InStove and Oregon State University’s Humanitarian Engineering Department for receiving the Impact Award in Impact Invention at the Elevating Impact Summit on February 13.  The award, presented by the Lemelson Foundation, goes to an entrepreneur or entrepreneurial team working to address a social, environmental, or economic problem through an invention-based enterprise creating a new physical product or products.  The groups were recognized for their collaboration to develop new technologies related to cooking stoves.

Making Gains in Rwanda

It will take new business models, not small donations, to provide meaningful development. 

by Evan Thomas

March 2015

Nearly a billion people in the world drink dirty water. Two billion don’t have a sanitary toilet. Three billion use campfires every day. Governments and charities spend billions of dollars every year to address these problems. And there are big successes in some places, but more innovation is needed.

In Rwanda, most rural villagers drink untreated water and burn firewood on open stoves. For the past ten years, our team has been learning how to address these challenges. In 2014, we reached nearly half a million people with water filters, improved cookstoves, and extensive health education. In 2015, we are on track to reach another two million people.

In the last three months, we’ve had a staff of nearly 1,000 working across the western province of Rwanda, a 6,000 square kilometer area, distributing filters and stoves at 400 community meetings and visiting nearly 110,000 homes. Working with the Rwanda National Police and the Ministry of Health, we moved 220,000 products across muddy roads and into homes.

So why Rwanda? Almost 20 years ago Rwanda suffered a genocide that killed nearly a million people. Some may still think of Rwanda as failed state.

In fact, Rwanda today is considered among the least corrupt countries in Africa. It has one of the fastest GDP growth rates in the region, and has the fastest annual decline in child deaths globally. But still, pneumonia and diarrhea remain the leading causes of illness and death among children in Rwanda.

About DelAgua

Our company, DelAgua, is a for-profit social enterprise using an innovative funding mechanism to distribute the filters and cookstoves free of charge to the poorest 25 percent of households across the country. Our business model involves United Nations carbon credits—generated from the projects themselves and sold to international buyers. This creates pay-for-performance system where we are incentivized to have an impact because that’s how we get paid.

The United Nations carbon credit market is a $120 billion a year industry. More than 90 percent of credits come from just five countries, and less than 2 percent from all of Africa. My team was the first in the world to commandeer this system and apply it to household drinking water.

This approach stands in contrast to a typical approach in poverty reduction programs globally. Typical funders, from church and community groups, universities, all the way up to the U.K. Department for International Development, the U.S. Agency for International Development, and the World Bank, provide funding for projects that are intended to improve the health and livelihood of people in developing communities. These include things like water pumps and water filters, cookstoves, latrines, and solar lighting systems.

This funding usually lasts a couple of years, and during that time the implementers will try to evaluate their impact. If you can afford it, you might run a randomized controlled trial to see if the projects are improving health or other outcomes. But, usually sooner rather than later, the funding runs out, and everyone moves on.

This has resulted in sad statistics. Some estimates suggest that at least half the water programs in some African countries are broken a few years after they’re installed.

Our intention is to instead lay the foundations for a long-term presence in Rwanda, making substantial contributions to public health and economic development.

Tubeho Neza

The program, called Tubeho Neza (meaning “let us live well”) is a partnership between DelAgua and the Rwandan Ministry of Health. We recruited more than 850 community health workers to manage the distribution and help households with installation and maintenance. This year, we’ll be back in nearly every household reinforcing healthy behaviors.

Independent researchers from the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine and Emory University are running a randomized controlled trial and using cellular sensors, household surveys, and other techniques to measure uptake, correct usage, and water and air quality improvements.

Many of us have heard of the idea that a donation of something like $25 will bring water to someone for his or her entire life in a developing country. But $25 donations haven’t solved this problem yet.

We need new and better business models, to engage businesses in these challenges, in a way that can help pay for ongoing services. We need payments to be based on performance, and not pictures and promises.

EVAN THOMAS is an assistant professor of mechanical engineering at Portland State University, COO of DelAgua Health, and CEO of SweetSense Inc.

Reprinted with permission, Mechanical Engineering magazine Vol. 137, No. 3, March 2015. Copyright ASME 2015.

Maintenance Matters

Funders of global development programs continue to incentivize construction. But the most cost-effective interventions often involve helping communities maintain what they already have.

By Evan Thomas – December 2014

Driving along rural dirt roads in many developing countries, you see frequent evidence of the generous intent of global humanitarian aid agencies. Most tangible are hand-driven water pumps that dot the landscape.

These pumps are the concrete and steel outputs of a global intent to provide more clean water to more people. Thousands, funded and implemented by organizations large and small, are installed every year in developing countries.

But, sadly, you can never predict whether the next water pump you pass will be surrounded by people, often women and children, filling their jerry cans, or will stand as a decrepit artifact of wasted resources.

30 and 80 percent of water pumps fail within a year of their installation

Studies show that between 30 and 80 percent of water pumps fail within a year of their installation. While the proximate failures may be a leaky seal, a broken riser, or a missing handle, these are only symptoms of the ultimate failure in how we fund, incentivize, and monitor these efforts.

Some experts suggest that for the cost of installing a new hand pump, operation and maintenance could be funded on its neighbor pump for a century. Or, put another way, an implementer with 500 installed pumps, could choose either to install 100 new hand pumps in a year or to maintain the original 500 for 20 years.

But the choice is possible only if funders can be persuaded to consider maintenance as interesting as new construction.

Instead, funders continue to focus on construction, and sustainability is usually addressed through “participatory community development,” where local communities are, in theory, empowered to manage their own water supplies. In reality, this approach has often not resulted in cost effective interventions.

Challenges exist for a myriad of health and environmental interventions

And these challenges exist not just for hand pumps, but for a myriad of health and environmental interventions both in developing and developed countries.

Some organizations are now testing alternatives that focus on outcomes rather than intent. Instead of pushing money toward projects based on promises, some implementers are showing how funders could support programs that demonstrate successful results and not just good intentions.

Technology can also play a role. Our team at Portland State University has designed sensors that are connected to cell phone networks to automatically report to the world how things are going with interventions like water pumps.

With support from the U.K. Department for International Development and the GSM Association and in partnership with Living Water International and the Rwanda Ministry of Natural Resources, our team is testing new approaches.

This summer we’re installing over 200 sensors and running a study of three different models for maintenance of hand pumps. We’re going to compare the current model of operation and maintenance against two others. One experiment is a “call us” model that requires communities to report pump outages, and the other is an “ambulance service” model in which the sensors directly notify technicians that maintenance is required. Data will be collected by sensors in all three models, but only in the ambulance service case are the technicians going to see what the sensors are saying.

With over half of water pumps failing in some countries, if we reduce that failure rate even by a quarter through better maintenance and accountability, these fancy sensors will pay for themselves.

These and other approaches can start to align intent with impact, and start to ensure that pictures of kids drinking clean water match the reality on the ground. ME 

EVAN THOMAS is an assistant professor of mechanical engineering at Portland State University, COO of DelAgua Health, and CEO of SweetSense Inc.

HOW CAN FUNDERS SUPPORT PROGRAMS THAT DEMONSTRATE SUCCESSFUL RESULTS, NOT JUST GOOD INTENTIONS?

Reprinted with permission, Mechanical Engineering magazine Vol. 136, No. 12, December 2014. Copyright ASME 2014.

Scroll To Top